The difference in the benchmark scores and the slight difference in performance too is likely because the MediaTek processor is built on a 12nm process as opposed to the 14nm process which Snapdragon uses for the 636. However, when it comes to competing with the Snapdragon 636, the chipset is a little behind. On running a simple benchmark test, it becomes evident that the MediaTek Helio P35 scores a better score as compared to the Snapdragon 625. Helio P35 vs Snapdragon 625, Snapdragon 636 and Snapdragon 660 Furthermore, an LTE radio with Cat-7 (300 Mbps download) Cat-12 (150 Mbps upload) along with 802.11 a/b/g/n Wi-Fi modem is integrated. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x with 1500 MHz or 933 MHz LPDDR3. The integrated graphics card is PowerVR GE8320 and clocks with up to 680 MHz. The four performance cores clock up to 2.3 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Helio P35 is a much more recent chipset, and this one integrates eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters (big.LITTLE).
#COMOARAR MEDIATEK HELIO P70 VERDUS SNAPDRAGON 835 BLUETOOTH#
This chipset also supports 802.11ac Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.1. Firstly the Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 is an octa-core SoC with eight ARM Cortex-A53 CPU cores firing up to 2 GHz paired with an Adreno 506 GPU, a DDR3L-1866 memory controller and an X9 LTE (Cat 7, 4G+, 300 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up) modem. Helio P35 and Snapdragon 625 Chipset Architectureīefore we move on to the comparison between these chipsets, it is important to understand the underlying architecture and the hardware which these chipsets come with.
0 kommentar(er)
